[rules-dev] Guvnor split-up

[Michael Anstis]

I will be starting the split tomorrow.



On 2 April 2013 11:23, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:

> studio might be a problem, like suite and platform, it might overlap with
> something they prefer in the RHT product names.
>
> We could have "workbench" instead of "work". That would still be under
> IWE. Integrated Workbench Environment. Or we could drop the Enviornement
> and have IWB - Integrated WorkBench.
>
> Mostly I want to make sure we don't chose something that skewer people's
> thinking that it's only suitable for a specific use case, hence my search
> for a more generic term. Also that we find a suitably short acronym. This
> framework can form the basis of a variety of use cases.
>
> IDE - Integrated Development Environment
> IWE - Integrated WorkBench Environment.
> IWB - Integrated WorkBench
> AWD - Advanced WorkBench
>
> Mark
>
> On 2 Apr 2013, at 10:05, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 02/04/2013, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I'm easy with "W" instead of "D". How about "Integrated Work Studio"
> >> instead of "Environment"?
> >>
> >
> > Seems to me that people have forgotten about the good old work bench.
> > Too nutsy-and-boltsy for the brighter future?
> >
> > -W
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20130410/8ed2f19c/attachment.html