[rules-dev] Guvnor split-up

[Michael Anstis]

I've updated the
document<https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1zovHiCJu0TnlKDuSq4xvRcuhThiR7G3ZdOWobooerdc/edit>to
reflect our discussions.

I will need 2 new droolsjbpm repositories: drools-iwb and kie-iwb-shared;
Geoffrey, Mark can you please create these (if you are in agreement)?

I have notionally included jBPM on the diagram to illustrate how
consistency across KIE could be achieved. I am not restructuring their
modules.

With kind regards,

Mike


On 10 April 2013 20:22, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com> wrote:

> I was going to use the following Group/Artifact IDs:
>
> org.drools:drools-iwb for Drools editors
>
> org.kie:guvnor for generic Guvnor.
>
> org.kie:kie-iwb-shared for the module for things that both Drools and jBPM
> editors need.
>
> I'd plan on kie-ide becoming kie-iwb.
> On 10 Apr 2013 19:19, "Mark Proctor" <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
>
>> Did we decided on an extension, instead of IDE?
>>
>> Mark
>> On 10 Apr 2013, at 17:11, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> I will be starting the split tomorrow.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2 April 2013 11:23, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
>>
>>> studio might be a problem, like suite and platform, it might overlap
>>> with something they prefer in the RHT product names.
>>>
>>> We could have "workbench" instead of "work". That would still be under
>>> IWE. Integrated Workbench Environment. Or we could drop the Enviornement
>>> and have IWB - Integrated WorkBench.
>>>
>>> Mostly I want to make sure we don't chose something that skewer people's
>>> thinking that it's only suitable for a specific use case, hence my search
>>> for a more generic term. Also that we find a suitably short acronym. This
>>> framework can form the basis of a variety of use cases.
>>>
>>> IDE - Integrated Development Environment
>>> IWE - Integrated WorkBench Environment.
>>> IWB - Integrated WorkBench
>>> AWD - Advanced WorkBench
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> On 2 Apr 2013, at 10:05, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On 02/04/2013, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> I'm easy with "W" instead of "D". How about "Integrated Work Studio"
>>> >> instead of "Environment"?
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > Seems to me that people have forgotten about the good old work bench.
>>> > Too nutsy-and-boltsy for the brighter future?
>>> >
>>> > -W
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > rules-dev mailing list
>>> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20130411/d73f57ac/attachment.html