[rules-dev] New Guvnor Web GUI (Role : business end user, developer)

[Michael Anstis]

No, but Alexandre Porcelli has various mock-ups available.

AFAIK Alexandre is tasked with developing the replacement.


On 19 April 2013 13:03, Charles Moulliard <ch007m at gmail.com> wrote:

> Excellent news. Is there a jira ticket describing what Navigator 6.0 will
> looks like ?
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> 1) Why have we completely change the Web GUI and disregard the role of
>> "Business" End user" loving Guvnor 5.5 in favor of something which is a
>> kind of interface for "Developer" ?
>>
>> It is already accepted that the Project Explorer in 6.0 is a poor
>> substitute for the Asset Viewer in 5.5. A new "Navigator" for 6.0.Final is
>> on the table.
>>
>>
>> 2) Why have we removed a lot of the features/functionality's proposed by
>> Guvnor 5.5 in Guvnor 6.x (import POJO ....) ?
>>
>> Guvnor 6.0 follows the changes made to Drools Expert 6.0. The previous
>> concept of what constituted a "package" has changed completely.
>>
>> This had led to a change in how POJO models need to be uploaded:
>> previously they just had to be on the classpath at build-/run-time; now
>> they need to be declared as a project dependency and uploaded to a
>> repository.
>>
>> There is a whole new API for 6.0 for developers using Drools Expert 6.0
>> too.
>>
>> With kind regards,
>>
>> Mike
>>
>>
>>  On 19 April 2013 08:25, Charles Moulliard <ch007m at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi,
>>>
>>> The new Guvnor Web GUI (6.x) is really disturbing for "Business end
>>> user" which are not Developer.
>>>
>>> Questions :
>>> 1) Why have we completely change the Web GUI and disregard the role of
>>> "Business" End user" loving Guvnor 5.5 in favor of something which is a
>>> kind of interface for "Developer" ?
>>> 2) Why have we removed a lot of the features/functionality's proposed by
>>> Guvnor 5.5 in Guvnor 6.x (import POJO ....) ?
>>>
>>> Don't forget that doing this kind of change will impact existing
>>> customers, their day to day business with such big change and we should be
>>> backward compatible with what was proposed earlier.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Charles Moulliard
>>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat)
>>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Charles Moulliard
> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat)
> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20130419/77c52133/attachment-0001.html