[rules-dev] Github commit rights cleanup

Esteban Aliverti esteban.aliverti at gmail.com
Thu Feb 14 09:18:59 EST 2013


Since the time we started using github I've always preferred the
pull-request mechanism instead of the direct commit. Having said that,
having commit permissions is sometimes helpful and that is why I would like
to remain in the commiters list: "just in case".

P.S: It's hard to get rid of the old SVN paradigms :).

Best Regards,


XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Esteban Aliverti
- Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com


On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 2:57 PM, Geoffrey De Smet
<ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com>wrote:

> Of course :)
>
> Not removing laune and nheron either.
>
> Op 14-02-13 14:51, Wolfgang Laun schreef:
> > If the proposed "remove" wouldn't let me do quick fixes like today's -
> > as you proposed - then you might want to let me keep this right, at
> > your discretion ;-)
> >
> > -W
> >
> > On 14/02/2013, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> Stemming from the SVN era, a lot of community contributers still have
> >> full commit rights on the blessed repositories.
> >> Because GitHub offers the "pull request" paradigm,
> >> the lack of commit rights are far less intrusive than in SVN.
> >>
> >> Many community contributors seem to prefer contributing changes through
> >> pull request paradigm,
> >> as it forces a core developer to sign off on the changes.
> >> Having direct commit rights can even be counter-intuitive:
> >> for example, if you edit a file directly on github, it doesn't create a
> >> pull request, but applies the changes directly.
> >> Commits from contributors that come in via pull requests are still
> >> attributed to the original author
> >> and count towards the original author's stats, so there are no
> >> additional disadvantages.
> >>
> >> Following that logic, I propose to *remove the commit rights on blessed
> >> for these contributors* in 72 hours:
> >> Please note that we appreciate past and future commits. Please keep the
> >> contributions coming! :)
> >>
> >> bauna
> >> bbrodt
> >> dennyxu
> >> dgutierr
> >> diega
> >> jcoleman0redhat0com
> >> jrenaat
> >> jsvitak
> >> JuanmaGonzalez
> >> KurtStam
> >> laune
> >> lazarotti
> >> leogomes
> >> lucazamador
> >> michaelneale
> >> michiBK
> >> mswiderski
> >> nheron
> >> nickboldt
> >> nmirasch
> >> pefernan
> >> RickJWagner
> >> ryanzhang
> >> saifulomar
> >> tkobayas
> >> trefor
> >> wmedvede
> >> yurloc
> >>
> >> If you're on this list and want to keep your commits rights on blessed,
> >> just reply to this mail and I 'll take you off the list. No long
> >> argumentation needed :)
> >>
> >> *Keep commits rights on the blessed repositories*
> >>
> >> etirelli
> >> ge0ffrey
> >> jervisliu
> >> krisv
> >> manstis
> >> mariofusco
> >> mdproctor
> >> mrietveld
> >> porcelli
> >> pzapata
> >> Rikkola
> >> Salaboy
> >> sotty
> >> tsurdilo
> >>
> >> *Might keep commits right on the blessed repositories*
> >> I 'll ask these people what they prefer and do that.
> >>
> >> esteban-aliverti
> >> triceo
> >> zenix
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-dev mailing list
> > rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20130214/36be6914/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the rules-dev mailing list