[rules-dev] Reminder [was: Inconsistent option property naming]

[Wolfgang Laun]

On 21/02/2013, Geoffrey De Smet <ge0ffrey.spam at gmail.com> wrote:
> Would it break backwards compatibility when changed?

How should I know? - If the property is set using the public static
final, then it's invariant under change.

-W

>
> Op 21-02-13 15:49, Wolfgang Laun schreef:
>> After a period of more than 24 hours, this point is still open, and
>> the question of adding or not adding the dot leaves me in a tight
>> spot.
>> -W
>>
>> On 20/02/2013, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Looking at
>>>
>>>    WorkItemHandlerOption implements MultiValueKnowledgeSessionOption
>>>
>>> contains
>>>
>>>    public static final String PROPERTY_NAME = "drools.workItemHandlers";
>>>
>>> which is used as
>>>
>>>   public String getPropertyName() {
>>>          return PROPERTY_NAME+name;
>>>      }
>>>
>>> so that some actual property setting would have to be the ugly
>>> concatenation
>>>
>>>    drools.workItemHandlerstheName = theHandler
>>>
>>> All (!) other multi-valued options  use a period to separate the fixed
>>> part from the user-defined tag, i.e.,
>>>
>>>   public static final String PROPERTY_NAME = "drools.workItemHandlers.";
>>>
>>> -W
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>