[rules-dev] Protobuf error

Edson Tirelli ed.tirelli at gmail.com
Wed Jun 5 13:50:02 EDT 2013


  Manstis, sorry I missed the dependency on that module:

    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.protobuf</groupId>
      <artifactId>protobuf-java</artifactId>
      <optional>true</optional>
    </dependency>

Sorry,
 Edson



On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Drools Workbench has started to get failing tests due to this:-
>
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/google/protobuf/Message
> 	at org.drools.compiler.kie.builder.impl.KieServicesImpl.newKieBuilder(KieServicesImpl.java:87)
> 	at org.kie.workbench.common.services.builder.Builder.build(Builder.java:116)
> 	at org.kie.workbench.common.services.builder.BuildServiceImplTest.testBuilderSimpleKProject(BuildServiceImplTest.java:69)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> 	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:47)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
> 	at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
> 	at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate(RunBefores.java:26)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:271)
> 	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
> 	at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:50)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:238)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:63)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:236)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:53)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:229)
> 	at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:309)
> 	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.execute(JUnit4Provider.java:252)
> 	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.executeTestSet(JUnit4Provider.java:141)
> 	at org.apache.maven.surefire.junit4.JUnit4Provider.invoke(JUnit4Provider.java:112)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> 	at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> 	at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> 	at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
> 	at org.apache.maven.surefire.util.ReflectionUtils.invokeMethodWithArray(ReflectionUtils.java:189)
> 	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ProviderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:165)
> 	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory.invokeProvider(ProviderFactory.java:85)
> 	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.runSuitesInProcess(ForkedBooter.java:115)
> 	at org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:75)
>
> Has something changed upstream? Do we need additional dependencies?
>
> I remember seeing on IRC yesterday that marshalling had broken(?) is this
> related.
>
> With kind regards,
>
> Mike
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>



-- 
  Edson Tirelli
  JBoss Drools Core Development
  JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-dev/attachments/20130605/009881b9/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-dev mailing list