[rules-dev] services registered by OSGi bundle activators of Kie, Drools and Jbpm are still needed ?

[Mark Proctor]

best thing to do is come onto irc, and we can start browsing classes together.

Mark
On 16 Aug 2014, at 15:18, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao at gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree that should have a consistency.
> 
> but where should we start from ?
> 
> are you able to point me to any resource describing a good setup 
> workflow using that new stuffs that I can use as base for my own 
> investigation?
> 
> The examples that I saw until now are using factories. what I can 
> remember last time I tried 6.x, that factories won't work in osgi, so 
> they are good candidates to be registered by those activators.
> 
> Cristiano
> 
> On 15-08-2014 13:22, Mark Proctor wrote:
>> I think things have evolved organically here. We probably need to do a full review, to ensure consistency.
>> 
>> I suspect know one would know the answers, without having to dig in the code first.
>> 
>> Mark
>> 
>> On 15 Aug 2014, at 16:02, Cristiano Gavião <cvgaviao at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> has a long time that I don't play with Drools and JBPM source code. This
>>> week I was walking through them again and saw a lot of new elements,
>>> interfaces and new ways to setup things.
>>> 
>>> I saw that some Blueprint specific annotations and classes were created
>>> (kie-aries-blueprint).
>>> But the existent osgi activators are still registering some services
>>> that seems not be appropriated anymore. at least they are different from
>>> the set of elements in blueprint namespace (environment, kmodule, kbase
>>> and others ) that I saw.
>>> 
>>> For example, in activator of drools-core we have a
>>> KnowledgeBaseFactoryServiceImpl being registered. in drools-compiler we
>>> have KnowledgeBuilderFactoryServiceImpl being registered.
>>> 
>>> I can't use blueprint, so I need to figure out what is the best setup
>>> workflow for OSGi and get the proper services registered.
>>> 
>>> Question, is the kie-aries-blueprint.xsd reflecting the actual state of
>>> kie, drools and jbpm core setup workflow, so I can use it as start point?
>>> 
>>> could someone check that and give me a feedback ?
>>> 
>>> many thanks,
>>> 
>>> Cristiano
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rules-dev mailing list
>>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev