[rules-dev] Drools and Java 1.8
Wolfgang Laun
wolfgang.laun at gmail.com
Wed Aug 20 12:53:42 EDT 2014
On 20 August 2014 18:03, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
> At some point yes, we don't have any timelines for it yet.
>
> Relate to this, our current priority is a new low level executable model, that facilities java8 written fluent rules.
> http://blog.athico.com/2014/07/drools-executable-model.html
I'll look at that. - Cartesian products combined with sets of filters
can be written quite nicely in pure Java - an alternative to certain
(simple) rule patterns?!
-W
>
>
> Mark
> On 20 Aug 2014, at 12:48, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The error message from 6.1.0.CR1 is clear: "Unable to resolve class
>> 'dynop.Main$$Lambda$1/20003005" in ClassFieldAccessorCache.
>>
>> Is the support for Java lambdas on the Drools roadmap?
>>
>> Regards
>> Wolfgng
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-dev mailing list
>> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
More information about the rules-dev
mailing list