Ge0ffrey won't be happy ;)<br><br>I'm sure he was keen to drop the revision\version number from the branch name; hence 5.2.0-M1 would probably have sufficed :)<br><br>Cheers,<br><br>Mike<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On 23 December 2010 06:22, Jervis Liu <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jliu@redhat.com">jliu@redhat.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hi, I've created a new branch for Drools 5.2.0-M1 release:<br>
5.2.0-M1.901ad86. This branch is created from version<br>
901ad86c8fad67051646. Check<br>
<a href="https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm/commits/master?page=1" target="_blank">https://github.com/droolsjbpm/droolsjbpm/commits/master?page=1</a> for<br>
version details. Please let me know if you think this branch should not<br>
contain a certain commit or a certain commit for 5.2.0-M1 release is<br>
missed on this branch.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Jervis<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
rules-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:rules-dev@lists.jboss.org">rules-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>