[rules-users] Rules Design Question

[Ronald R. DiFrango]

Here is a question though now, I have the following:

mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, $amt2 : sumCmAndRnr)
eval($amt1.doubleValue() != $amt2.doubleValue())

Is there a way for me to eliminate the eval given that it makes the rules
engine sub-optimal?  I guess one strategy is to create two separate classes
to house the results, but man that seems messy.

On 4/11/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> I got it working, but using Salience alone.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ron
>
> On 4/10/07, Ronald R. DiFrango < ron.difrango at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Michael,
> >
> > OK, here is my attempt to convert the flow chart I have into words:
> >
> > Step 1: Sum ObjectA
> > Step 2: Sum ObjectB
> > Step 3: Sum ObjectC
> > Step 4: Perform check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do something if it
> > fails
> > Step 5: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do
> > something if it fails
> > Step 6: Perform an additional check on sum's from Steps 1,2 & 3 and do
> > something if it fails
> >
> > I literally need it in this order and I was thinking that agenda groups
> > along with salience could get me there, but I have never used them before.
> >
> > Does that help?
> >
> > Ron
> >
> > On 4/6/07, Michael Rhoden < mrhoden at franklinamerican.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >  Please give a better example or some pseudo code of what you are
> > > trying to do.
> > >
> > > -Michael
> > >
> > >  ------------------------------
> > >    *From:* rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org [mailto:
> > > rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] *On Behalf Of *Ronald R. DiFrango
> > > *Sent:* Friday, April 06, 2007 8:15 AM
> > > *To:* Rules Users List
> > > *Subject:* [rules-users] Rules Design Question
> > >
> > >  All,
> > >
> > > I have a rules design question for the community.  I have 3 lists of
> > > different types of objects that I need to sum if a certain attribute is
> > > present on each one of them.  Then after the summing has taken place execute
> > > other rules based upon the results of the summation.
> > >
> > > Is there a way that I can accomplish this via salience or agenda
> > > groups?
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > >
> > > Ron
> > >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070411/38f67857/attachment.html