[rules-users] How do you use Ruleflows with StatelessSession's?

[Mark Proctor]

I'm not sure, will have to think on it the api is stateless and uses a 
single execute method, I'm not sure where the startProcess fits into that.

Mark


Shahad Ahmed wrote:
> Mark,
>  
> Thanks for the reply. Are there any plans to make this functionality 
> available directly via the API, rather than having to add a "dummy" 
> rule into a rulebase in order to get workflow to work with stateless 
> sessions?
>  
> I can see how to make the change myself to ReteooStatelessSession  by 
> adding a setRuleFlow method that sets a private processId instance 
> that all the execute methods can start if set (I guess an unset method 
> wouldn't be needed for stateless sessions). An alternative might be 
> to add variants of the existing execute and executeWithResults that 
> also takes a Ruleflow processid, but I think this would add too many 
> variations of execute. I'll probably have to make this change to use 
> drools with the current application I'm writing, as modifying the 
> rules will not be an option - I'm happy to submit the changes if you 
> think this is worthwhile.
>  
> Shahad
>  
>
>
>  
> On 8/10/07, *Mark Proctor* <mproctor at codehaus.org 
> <mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org>> wrote:
>
>     you would have to call drools.getWorkingMemory().startProcess(id)
>     from inside of a consequence.
>
>     Mark
>     Shahad Ahmed wrote:
>>     Does anyone know if it's possible to use a ruleflow with a
>>     StatelessSession?
>>      
>>     The current documentation and API seem to show examples with
>>     StatefullSessions i.e.:
>>      
>>     statefullSession.startProcess(id);
>>     statefullSession.fireAllRules();
>>     etc...
>>      
>>     However, there doesn't seem to be anything equivalent in the API
>>     for StatelessSesssion's. I'd really like to be able to use the
>>     new sequential mode (i.e. with a StatelessSession) and ruleflow.
>>      
>>     Regards,
>>     Shahad
>>      
>>      
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     rules-users mailing list
>>     rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>       
>
>      
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     rules-users mailing list
>     rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070811/2b7fa1ad/attachment.html