[rules-users] Re: Independent rule evaluations

[Brian Sam-Bodden]

How about RuleFlows? If there is a "work flow" flavor to these groups
of Rules then I think a Rule Flow could help. I don't know how the
underlying implementation works but I think that you will not have the
"when" parts of those Rules not active in the Flow be evaluated.

On 8/13/07, Yuri <ydewit at gmail.com> wrote:
> Brian Sam-Bodden <bsbodden <at> integrallis.com> writes:
> > You can use Agenda Filters or Agenda Groups I believe.
>
> Hi Brian,
>
> afaik, agenda-groups just layers the rule activations so that it becomes easier
> to manage their activations instead of resorting to managing saliences on
> individual rules, but it does not preclude the rule "when" part to be evaluated
> when asserting new facts.
>
> I can easily create a custom barrier object that I can assert when it is time to
> trigger the eval of the time consuming rules, but I was wondering whether there
> was any built in functionality that would accomplish the same.
>
> thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>