[rules-users] Re: [drools-user] using function from another .drl file

Michael Neale michael.neale at gmail.com
Fri Jan 12 16:24:02 EST 2007


Yes the PackageDescr object has a package name property which is where the
name lives. Not sure if you can easily get that from PackageBuilder, but if
you go a little more low level, you can use DrlParser to get PackageDescr
yourself, and there you go (peek at the PackageBuilder source code if you
need more hints).

On 1/12/07, Justine Hlista <justine at vsasset.com> wrote:
>
> Ah -- that was the problem, I was using a new packagebuilder each time
> (d'oh)!
>
> But that brings up another thing...in some cases, I may want the rules
> source for a given package to be spread across multiple drl files. (I know
> the convention is to have everything from the package in a single drl file,
> but for management and organization we may need to spread across multiple
> drl files). In order to add drls to an existing package, I have to be able
> to get the package name from the drl to look up a hashed builder. Is there
> any part of the public API, e.g from the antlr parser, that might help me
> with that? I have a very inefficient workaround at the moment, but if I
> could get to the parse interface, I might be able to make it better.
>
> Thanks,
> Justine
>
>
> On 1/12/07, Michael Neale <michael.neale at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > If you use the one packagebuilder, and you add the source first from the
> > one with the function, and then the others, yes that should work just fine !
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070112/ba8f1228/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list