[rules-users] Specifing rules with the help of OCL

[Mark Proctor]

There is no reason why it can't be done with OCL, and I often hear of 
people writting OCL drivers. I imagine most developers choose a 
proprietary language because they feel it empowers the paradigm further, 
for instance our I believe our language has  less repitition  and more 
expressability that OCL, which is  made possible due to our specific use 
case.

Mark

but more simply its not as natural a fir for a ru
Elena Ţibrea wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been recently reading an article about OCL where the authour 
> states he sees no major dificulties for adopting OCL as notation for 
> specifying the /activation condition/ that triggers the /action part/ 
> of a reactive rule.
>  
> I wonder than why rule engines use proprietary rule languages and not 
> smth standardized like OCL?
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070117/9ef75953/attachment.html