[rules-users] jdk1.3 compatible??

[Arvind Patil]

Why do you say that Drools 2.5 is a "different beast"?
Could you please elaborate on that?

Regards
RV


On 1/21/07, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
>
> You have drools 2.5 - but thats a very different beast. There are no other
> open source rules engines really. Have you maybe tried an older version of
> jess?
>
> Mark
> Arvind Patil wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
> If Drools is not jdk1.3 compliant, then could you suggest any other
> open-source jDK1.3-based Rule Engine that is as good as DROOLS is in terms
> of algorithm used, performance etc?
>
> -RV
>
>
> On 1/21/07, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
> >
> > No its not JDK1.3 compatible. I've heard somene has done a port, but
> > they haven't provided the code.
> >
> > Mark
> > Arvind Patil wrote:
> >
> >  Hi,
> > We are contemplating using Drools in our project.
> > We need the following info:
> > Is Drools jdk1.3 compatible?
> > Can we use it for jdk1.3 based project?
> >
> > Thanks
> >  RV
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing listrules-users at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Arvind.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing listrules-users at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Arvind.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070122/a8e6e64a/attachment.html