[rules-users] jdk1.3 compatible??

[Mark Proctor]

The differences are too big to go into here. We have a page summarising 
2.x to 3.0 migration, thats your best starting point:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Drools2Migration

Mark
Arvind Patil wrote:
> Why do you say that Drools 2.5 is a "different beast"?
> Could you please elaborate on that?
>  
> Regards
> RV
>
>  
> On 1/21/07, *Mark Proctor* <mproctor at codehaus.org 
> <mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org>> wrote:
>
>     You have drools 2.5 - but thats a very different beast. There are
>     no other open source rules engines really. Have you maybe tried an
>     older version of jess?
>
>
>     Mark
>     Arvind Patil wrote:
>>     Hi Mark,
>>     If Drools is not jdk1.3 compliant, then could you suggest any
>>     other open-source jDK1.3-based Rule Engine that is as good as
>>     DROOLS is in terms of algorithm used, performance etc?
>>      
>>     -RV
>>
>>      
>>     On 1/21/07, *Mark Proctor* <mproctor at codehaus.org
>>     <mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org>> wrote:
>>
>>         No its not JDK1.3 compatible. I've heard somene has done a
>>         port, but they haven't provided the code.
>>
>>         Mark
>>         Arvind Patil wrote:
>>>         Hi,
>>>         We are contemplating using Drools in our project.
>>>         We need the following info:
>>>         Is Drools jdk1.3 compatible?
>>>         Can we use it for jdk1.3 based project?
>>>          
>>>         Thanks
>>>          RV
>>>          
>>>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         rules-users mailing list
>>>         rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>           
>>
>>          
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         rules-users mailing list
>>         rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>         <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Regards,
>>     Arvind.
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     rules-users mailing list
>>     rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>       
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     rules-users mailing list
>     rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>     <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>
>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Regards,
> Arvind.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070122/e0a64e78/attachment.html