[rules-users] Re: 4.0.0.MR3 Problems

[Mark Proctor]

yes I guess so, can you put this problem in the wiki, and your work around.

Thanks

Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
> Mark,
>
> You know what, it was a Drools project.  But, it was one created under 
> the old 3.0.6 version.  I wonder if this is a migration issue then?
>
> Ron
>
> On 7/4/07, * Mark Proctor* <mproctor at codehaus.org 
> <mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org>> wrote:
>
>     Ron,
>
>     Could you clarify - in Eclipse was this project created as a
>     standard Java project or a Drools project? When Drools creates a
>     project it adds in jdt-core from the plugin classpath, which
>     doesn't happen in standard java projects. I've check this myself,
>     and it seems to work fine.
>
>     Mark
>
>     Mark Proctor wrote:
>>     hmm yes that could be a but with JBoss IDE. I'm using the current
>>     classloader, suspect i need to use another one.... We want to use
>>     the JDT that is already in the Eclipse system.
>>
>>     Kris, do you know what classLoader I need to search for Eclipse?
>>
>>     Mark
>>     Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
>>>     Mark,
>>>
>>>     I hope you saw that my earlier problem had to do with the fact
>>>     that the JBoss Rules IDE did not include the jar file for
>>>     theclass Java compiler.  Once I added it, it started to work. 
>>>     is this a bug in the JBoss Rules IDE as I never had to do this
>>>     before?
>>>
>>>     Now onto the other problem, does that mean I have to do
>>>     something like drools.getWorkingMemory().getQueryResults() then?
>>>
>>>     Thanks Again!
>>>
>>>     Ron
>>>
>>>     On 7/3/07, * Mark Proctor* <mproctor at codehaus.org
>>>     <mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>         We have slimmed down what KnowledgeHelper does, so it only
>>>         does operations involving the current rules context (i.e.
>>>         the Tuple of matched data), as KH supplies access to the
>>>         WorkingMemory you can simply call getQueryResults on that.
>>>
>>>         Mark
>>>         Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
>>>>         OK, I got this workinkg now, by adding the jar file
>>>>         core-3.2.3.v_686_R32x.jar from the distribution to my project.
>>>>
>>>>         Now though when I run it, I get the following error:
>>>>
>>>>         The method getQueryResults(String) is undefined for the
>>>>         type KnowledgeHelper
>>>>
>>>>         has getQueryResults been removd in 4.x or renamed?
>>>>
>>>>         On 7/3/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango * <ron.difrango at gmail.com
>>>>         <mailto:ron.difrango at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>             All,
>>>>
>>>>             I am in the process of migrating my 3.0. project to the
>>>>             4.x series and when I attempt to run my code I get the
>>>>             following exception when I attempt to load my .drl files:
>>>>
>>>>             Caused by: org.drools.RuntimeDroolsException : Unable
>>>>             to load dialect
>>>>             'org.drools.rule.builder.dialect.java.JavaDialect:java'
>>>>
>>>>             Here is my package builder code:
>>>>
>>>>             static
>>>>                 {
>>>>                     try
>>>>                     {
>>>>                         builder = new PackageBuilder();
>>>>                         builder.addPackageFromDrl( new
>>>>             InputStreamReader(
>>>>             RtvDecisionEngine.class.getResourceAsStream("rtv.drl" )
>>>>             ) );
>>>>                         builder.addPackageFromDrl( new
>>>>             InputStreamReader(
>>>>             RtvDecisionEngine.class.getResourceAsStream
>>>>             ("modelDiscrepancyRules.drl" ) ) );
>>>>                         ruleBase = RuleBaseFactory.newRuleBase();
>>>>                         ruleBase.addPackage( builder.getPackage() );
>>>>                     }
>>>>                     catch(Exception e)
>>>>                     {
>>>>                         throw new RuntimeException("Failure loading
>>>>             the Rules", e);
>>>>                     }
>>>>                 }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>             Any thoughts appreciated.
>>>>
>>>>             Ron
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>>         rules-users mailing list
>>>>         rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>>
>>>>          <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>>>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>>           
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         rules-users mailing list
>>>         rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>>         https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>
>>>
>>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     rules-users mailing list
>>>     rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>>      <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>>       
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     rules-users mailing list
>>     rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>>      <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>       
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070704/9fcab918/attachment.html