[rules-users] Re: No OR syntax

[Ronald R. DiFrango]

OK, this does not looked correct syntax or that it is supported.  Here is
the exception I get:

Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
    at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.test.MainBasedTester.testRules(
MainBasedTester.java:31)
    at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.test.MainBasedTester.main(
MainBasedTester.java:23)
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Failure loading the Rules
    at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.rules.RtvDecisionEngine.<clinit>(
RtvDecisionEngine.java:48)
    ... 2 more
Caused by: org.drools.rule.InvalidRulePackage: [22,59]: unknown:22:59
Unexpected token '|'[22,89]: unknown:22:89 mismatched token:
[@162,707:707=')',<13>,22:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN[33,59]:
unknown:33:59 Unexpected token '|'[33,89]: unknown:33:89 mismatched token:
[@263,1112:1112=')',<13>,33:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN[44,59]:
unknown:44:59 Unexpected token '|'[44,89]: unknown:44:89 mismatched token:
[@364,1510:1510=')',<13>,44:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN[55,59]:
unknown:55:59 Unexpected token '|'[55,89]: unknown:55:89 mismatched token:
[@465,1924:1924=')',<13>,55:89]; expecting type LEFT_PAREN
    at org.drools.rule.Package.checkValidity(Package.java:409)
    at org.drools.common.AbstractRuleBase.addPackage(AbstractRuleBase.java
:262)
    at com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.rules.RtvDecisionEngine.<clinit>(
RtvDecisionEngine.java:44)
    ... 2 more

And here is my rules:

#created on: Jul 7, 2007
package com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.rules

#list any import classes here.
import java.math.BigDecimal;
import java.math.BigInteger;

import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.bw.Constants;
import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.bw.DocumentTypes;
import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.bw.StatusConstants;

import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.EffectivePrice;
import com.circuitcity.rtvcrms.RtvHeader;


#declare any global variables here

rule "Line Set Open #1"
    salience -10
    when
        rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.OPEN)
        rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
    then
        System.out.println("Line Set Open #1");
        rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED);
        update(rtvHeader);
end

rule "Line Set Open #2"
    salience -10
    when
        rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.OPEN)
        rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.MATCHED | !=
StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
    then
        System.out.println("Line Set Open #2");
        rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.OPEN);
        update(rtvHeader);
end

rule "Line Set Matched #1"
    salience -10
    when
        rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.MATCHED)
        rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.MATCHED | !=
StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
    then
        System.out.println("Line Set Matched #1");
        rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED);
        update(rtvHeader);
end

rule "Line Set Matched #2"
    salience -10
    when
        rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.MATCHED)
        rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
StatusConstants.APPROVAL )
    then
        System.out.println("Line Set Matched #2");
        rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.MATCHED);
        update(rtvHeader);
end

rule "Line Set Approval #1"
    salience -10
    when
        rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
        rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.MATCHED )
    then
        System.out.println("Line Set Approval #1");
        rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.APPROVAL);
        update(rtvHeader);
end

rule "Line Set Approval #2"
    salience -10
    when
        rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
        rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status == StatusConstants.OPEN )
    then
        System.out.println("Line Set Approval #2");
        rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED);
        update(rtvHeader);
end

rule "Line Set Approval #3"
    salience -10
    when
        rtvDetailLine : DetailLine(rtvNumber != null, rtvNumber ==
cmRtvNumber, lineNumber != null, status == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
        rtvHeader : RtvHeader( status != StatusConstants.OPEN )
    then
        System.out.println("Line Set Approval #3");
        rtvHeader.setStatus(StatusConstants.PARTIALLY_MATCHED);
        update(rtvHeader);
end


As another note, the JBoss Rules IDE is NOT reporting any errors with the
syntax.

On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Answered my own question:
>
> MyObject (status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | == StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
>
> On 7/7/07, Ronald R. DiFrango < ron.difrango at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > If I remember correctly, in the 4.x version of Drools you were adding an
> > or type syntax where you could compare a value against multiple values.
> > What is the new syntax for it?
> >
> > I am looking to do something logically like:
> >
> > MyObject (status in ("Open" or "Matched")
> >
> > Ron
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070707/31cba0ef/attachment.html