[rules-users] Re: No OR syntax

Mark Proctor mproctor at codehaus.org
Sun Jul 8 18:29:48 EDT 2007


The 'in' operator is just sugar for == 'stilton' || == 'brie' but we 
felt it improved the declarative nature of the language sufficiently to 
warrant the sugar.

Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
> Nice; an in operator just like SQL :-)
>
> On 7/7/07, *Mark Proctor* <mproctor at codehaus.org 
> <mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org>> wrote:
>
>     Sorry it's now && and ||
>     You can also us the 'in' operator
>     Cheese( type in ( 'stilton', 'brie' ))
>     Cheese( type not in ( 'stilton', 'brie' ))
>     Cheese( type memberOf $myCheeseTypeList )
>     Cheese( type not memberOf $myCheeseTypeList )
>
>     Mark
>
>     Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
>>     Answered my own question:
>>
>>     MyObject (status == StatusConstants.MATCHED | ==
>>     StatusConstants.APPROVAL)
>>
>>     On 7/7/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango* < ron.difrango at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:ron.difrango at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         All,
>>
>>         If I remember correctly, in the 4.x version of Drools you
>>         were adding an or type syntax where you could compare a value
>>         against multiple values.  What is the new syntax for it?
>>
>>         I am looking to do something logically like:
>>
>>         MyObject (status in ("Open" or "Matched")
>>
>>         Ron
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     rules-users mailing list
>>
>>     rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>      <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>
>>       
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070708/409cb25d/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list