[rules-users] Re: 4.0 Language Updates

[Ronald R. DiFrango]

On a similiar note what if you do:

BigDecimal != 0

On 7/9/07, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Edson!
>
> Does the equals methods compare the underlying values or the object
> references?
>
> On 7/9/07, Edson Tirelli < tirelli at post.com> wrote:
> >
> >    Ronald,
> >
> >    Yes, this is one way (I would say probably the preferred way) of
> > doing it.
> >    For BigDecimals, drools will use equals() method.
> >
> >    Look at the BigDecimalFactory class for details.
> >
> >    []s
> >    Edson
> >
> > 2007/7/9, Ronald R. DiFrango <ron.difrango at gmail.com >:
> > >
> > > OK, I think I found it and here is what the rule could look like:
> > >
> > > rule "Repayment Code Requires Approval"
> > >     salience 60
> > >
> > >     when
> > >         repaymentCode : RepaymentCode( code == "MD", matchApprv == "Y"
> > > )
> > >         mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty,
> > > sumCmAndRnr == $amt1)
> > >     then
> > >         System.out.println("Repayment Code Requires Approval");
> > >         processMDAdjustments( drools.getWorkingMemory().getQueryResults( "MD Adjustments" ),
> > > StatusConstants.APPROVAL);
> > >         System.out.println("mdOutput: " + mdOutput);
> > > end
> > >
> > > Now my question is, how does Drools handle these objects and the
> > > comparison because the underlying objects are BigDecimal?
> > >
> > > On 7/9/07, Ronald R. DiFrango < ron.difrango at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > I have the following rule:
> > > >
> > > > rule "Repayment Code Requires Approval"
> > > >     salience 60
> > > >
> > > >     when
> > > >         repaymentCode : RepaymentCode( code == "MD", matchApprv ==
> > > > "Y" )
> > > >         mdOutput : ModelDiscrepancyOutput( $amt1 : sumRTVQty, $amt2
> > > > : sumCmAndRnr)
> > > >         eval($amt1.doubleValue() == $amt2.doubleValue())
> > > >     then
> > > >         System.out.println("Repayment Code Requires Approval");
> > > >         processMDAdjustments(drools.getWorkingMemory().getQueryResults(
> > > > "MD Adjustments" ), StatusConstants.APPROVAL);
> > > >         System.out.println("mdOutput: " + mdOutput);
> > > > end
> > > >
> > > > If I remember correctly, there was going to be an update to the
> > > > rules language that would allow me to eliminate the eval.  Is this true and
> > > > if so what is the syntax that accomplishes this?
> > > >
> > > > Ron
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rules-users mailing list
> > > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >   Edson Tirelli
> >   Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
> >   Office: +55 11 3529-6000
> >   Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
> >   JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070709/157ef512/attachment.html