[rules-users] 4.0 JBoss Rules IDE - JDK 1.4 compiler setting
Mark Proctor
mproctor at codehaus.org
Mon Jul 16 17:00:35 EDT 2007
We generate functions as static methods on a class, and then import
those as static imports. Janino supports static imports and Eclipse can
support static imports while still having jdk1.4 bytecode compatability
- so we take advantage of that. Our next release will also be jdk1.5 only.
Mark
Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
> Mark,
>
> Just curious as to why the IDE treats functions as static imports?
>
> Ron
>
> On 7/9/07, *Ronald R. DiFrango* < ron.difrango at gmail.com
> <mailto:ron.difrango at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Mark,
>
> I would be happy to help. The short answer is that, I need my
> entire project - Java classes and all in JDK 1.4 format. When I
> tried playing with the settings in Eclipse it keeps telling me
> that either source or class files that are generated must be at or
> above the other's level. It does not look like I can mix and
> match the two of them.
>
> I guess my alternative would be to create an ANT script that
> generated the 1.4 JAR file. BTW..it does run just fine and like a
> champ!
>
> Ron
>
>
> On 7/9/07, * Mark Proctor* <mproctor at codehaus.org
> <mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org>> wrote:
>
> On M3? if you look at the JavaDialect you should see that the
> source is always set ti jdk1.5, can never go below that, but
> the target is 1.4 - which should allow static imports in a
> jdk1.4 environment. The unit tests for it are working, maybe
> you can look into debugging this one for me?
>
> Mark
> Ronald R. DiFrango wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I had to change the compiler setting from JDK 5.0 to JDK 1.4
>> and no all of a sudden my DRL files give me the following error:
>>
>> Severity and Description Path Resource Location
>> Creation Time Id
>> Syntax error, static imports are only available if source
>> level is 5.0
>> RtvDecisionEngine/src/rules/com/circuitcity/rtvcrms/rules
>> modelDiscrepancyRules.drl line 20 1184006663382 77860
>>
>> On all rules.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Ron
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>>
>>
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>> <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070716/132e2a6b/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list