[rules-users] Drools api/language changes break backwards compatability

[Mark Proctor]

Those changes are already detailed in various places, we will bring them 
together into one place and put into the distribution in the README. The 
upgrade script already handles some basic stuff (see blog), and over 
time, with community involvement, we hope to improve it further.

Mark
Paul Smith wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I haven't been keeping as up to date on the mailing lists as I would 
> have liked and am planning to move up to 4 as soon as it goes GA. Will 
> you be publishing a list of likely breakage points or a migration 
> document for moving from 3 to 4? We've just gone through a bit of pain 
> to move from the UML2 1.x api up to the UML2 2.x api where there were 
> significant changes but it was made much easier by the eclipse.org 
> <http://eclipse.org> guys producing a migration document on the 
> eclipse site. Fortunately I have a good swag of unit tests but a list 
> of pointers in terms of what to look for would be good.
>
> Regards
>
> Paul Smith
>
> On 7/23/07, *Mark Proctor* <mproctor at codehaus.org 
> <mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org>> wrote:
>
>     http://blog.athico.com/2007/07/drools-apilanguage-changes-break.html
>     _______________________________________________
>     rules-users mailing list
>     rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
>     https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070723/142cb548/attachment.html