[rules-users] processBuilder constructor

[Kris Verlaenen]

You shouldn't really access the ProcessBuilder directly anymore, we've added 
support in the PackageBuilder for that (similar to rules, decision tables, 
etc.):
PackageBuilder.addRuleFlow(Reader)

If you want to access ProcessBuilder directly, you can just provide an empty 
PackageBuilder, but it seems unlikely that you don't want to add any rules, 
as the ruleflows main purpose is to manage the evaluation of rulesets.  The 
ProcessBuilder requires access to a PackageBuilder as it internally also 
uses rules to control the ruleflow process execution.

Kris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "hypnosat7" <ablarbi at yahoo.fr>
To: <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 2:49 PM
Subject: [rules-users] processBuilder constructor


>
> hi,
>
> Why the constructor take a package builder as argument :
> ProcessBuilder(PackageBuilder packageBuilder)
> isn't necessary to have rules in packageBuilder to add process to a rule
> base ?
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://www.nabble.com/processBuilder-constructor-tf4151428.html#a11809817
> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users