[rules-users] Can drools use to validata a large no of facts?

[Michael Neale]

thats a bit of a "how long is a piece of string" question really.
I would say that it may or may not be a problem ;)

For really large volumes of data, people normally may filter it if they have
some basic criteria they can use, and the data comes from a database etc.

Relational databases are good as fishing for data from a large set, they are
designed for that specifically. Havign said that, the "from" keyword
in 3.1will certainly help with that, as you can have a query embedded
that pulls
data from a datasource only when needed.

On 3/29/07, vista2007 <my_vista2007 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> I want to validate a large volume of data which is asserted to the working
> as
> fcats. Is this feasiable for an application ? Is there a way to implement
> this efficiently and without memory problums ?
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Can--drools-use-to-validata-a-large-no-of-facts--tf3485259.html#a9729756
> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070330/f1121c2c/attachment.html