[rules-users] JBRMS

[Michael Neale]

Yes, as discussed, you need to add import statements for the types you want
the BRMS to be aware of - if you like, create a feature request jira for
auto importing. I deliberately didn't do it cause I thought it would cause
more confusion, but perhaps I was wrong.

Also, the video on the blog: http://markproctor.blogspot.com I made shows
this.

Michael.

On 5/24/07, Marcos Tengelmann <marcos.tengelmann at auster.com.br> wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>
> We are trying the new module that came on new Drools, and it is an amazing
> work on such time frame. Congratulations
>
> Well, during our tests, we uploaded a Jar to the tool, and one problem we
> have identified is that NOT all classes of the model are available as FACTS.
> My question here is: Is there any kind of contraints in order to BRMS to
> find all classes? Is there any restriction? What are the basic thing my
> class must have in order to appear in the GUI of the BRMS as an available
> fact?
>
> The other question is: How could us contribute (If any interest on this,
> of course) , with the module? In particular we are looking for
> internationalization stuff. It is very important for us, and I think might
> be interesting for others users.
>
> Thanks
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070525/398045a1/attachment.html