[rules-users] does WorkingMemory.iterator support remove()?

[Godmar Back]

Thanks - consider supporting it for efficiency. (Otherwise, removing a
set of facts from working memory requires a temporary container to
hold the facts to be removed.)

 - Godmar

On 10/5/07, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
> Godmar Back wrote:
> > Does the iterator returned by WorkingMemory.iterator support remove()?
> >
> > I checked the javadoc and the Drools manual, but may have missed it.
> >
> If you try it you'll get an exception thrown "UnsupportedOperationException"
> http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-core/src/main/java/org/drools/util/JavaIteratorAdapter.java
> > Please answer and augment documentation.
> >
> >  - Godmar
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>