[rules-users] Possible shadow proxy issue with JDK Dynamic proxies in 4.0.1?

[Chris West]

I'll be glad to test with the trunk.  Do you have a snapshot build or do I
have to build my own?  It would be nice for your downloads area to contain a
nightly snapshot build.

-Chris

On 9/17/07, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
>
>  Maybe some fixes broke this? can you test with trunk, and submit a jira
> with a self contained test if you still have a problem
>
> Mark
> Chris West wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> After stumbling upon an issue with version 4.0.0 using "memberOf", I
> decided to upgrade to version 4.0.1.  After upgrading, my rules do not
> seem to fire correctly.  In the past, I had discovered issues (prior to
> 4.0.0 release) relating to my use of JDK dynamic proxies as facts.  The
> drools team developed a fix for my problem, and it involved searching for a
> base interface type to build the shadow proxy from when the class type is
> final (all JDK dynamic proxies are).  This problem I'm seeing now seems very
> similar in behavior to what I saw before.
>
> Is there any change related to shadow proxies that went into 4.0.1?
>
> Thanks,
> -Chris West
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070918/a70ce44f/attachment.html