[rules-users] Possible shadow proxy issue with JDK Dynamic proxies in 4.0.1?

Chris West crayzfishr at gmail.com
Tue Sep 18 10:17:24 EDT 2007


I tested the SNAPSHOT, and the problem exists.  So my tests indicate that
the example attached to the JIRA runs properly on 4.0.0, does not work on
4.0.1, and does not work on the trunk SNAPSHOT.

-Chris

On 9/18/07, Chris West <crayzfishr at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Edson,
>
> Thanks for the snapshot build location.  I just created a JIRA against
> 4.0.1 illustrating the problem.  I'll now test against the snapshot.
>
> http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBRULES-1203
>
> Thanks,
> -Chris West
>
> On 9/18/07, Edson Tirelli <tirelli at post.com > wrote:
> >
> >
> >    Snapshot build:
> > http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/artifacts/jboss-rules
> >
> >    Thanks.
> >
> > 2007/9/18, Chris West < crayzfishr at gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > I'll be glad to test with the trunk.  Do you have a snapshot build or
> > > do I have to build my own?  It would be nice for your downloads area to
> > > contain a nightly snapshot build.
> > >
> > > -Chris
> > >
> > > On 9/17/07, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >  Maybe some fixes broke this? can you test with trunk, and submit a
> > > > jira with a self contained test if you still have a problem
> > > >
> > > > Mark
> > > > Chris West wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > After stumbling upon an issue with version 4.0.0 using "memberOf", I
> > > > decided to upgrade to version 4.0.1.  After upgrading, my rules do
> > > > not seem to fire correctly.  In the past, I had discovered issues (prior to
> > > > 4.0.0 release) relating to my use of JDK dynamic proxies as facts.
> > > > The drools team developed a fix for my problem, and it involved searching
> > > > for a base interface type to build the shadow proxy from when the class type
> > > > is final (all JDK dynamic proxies are).  This problem I'm seeing now seems
> > > > very similar in behavior to what I saw before.
> > > >
> > > > Is there any change related to shadow proxies that went into 4.0.1?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -Chris West
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rules-users mailing list
> > > > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > rules-users mailing list
> > > > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > rules-users mailing list
> > > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >   Edson Tirelli
> >   Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
> >   Office: +55 11 3529-6000
> >   Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
> >   JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070918/1859bbf3/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list