[rules-users] licensing text

[Mark Proctor]

We aren't lawyers, so can't offer legal advice. But all the libraries we 
use have compatible licenses, i.e. are not GPL etc. We do allow LGPL.

Mark
Krishnan wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> I am trying to use drools 4.0 for our project and understand the 
> licensing agreement for drools. Drools
> uses Apache license where as some of the dependant libraries use New 
> BSD and other type of licenses.
> Since I am not a lawyer, does anybody have any idea of any 
> implications on any problems related to
> the licenses ?.
>
> Drools use the following libraries
>
> antlr-runtime-3.0.jar
> core-3.2.3.v_686_R32x.jar
> janino-2.5.7.jar
> jsr94-1.1.jar
> jxl-2.4.2.jar
> mvel14-1.2rc1.jar
> xercesImpl-2.4.0.jar
> xml-apis-1.0.b2.jar
> xpp3-1.1.3.4.O.jar
> xstream-1.1.3.jar
>
> (a) Do you guys have the licensing agreement for each of these jars ?
> (b) Also, I tried searching for the websites using their name but some 
> of them I am not able to find. IF you
> have the website information for these jars, that will help.
> (c) Has anybody run into any particular licensing issue problem with 
> Drools ?.
>
> Any help is appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> Krishnan.
>
>
> -- 
> Sivaramakrishna Iyer Krishnan (Anand)
>
> Never assume the obvious is true.
> - William Safire
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20070926/385e121b/attachment.html