[rules-users] From 4.0.6 to 4.0.4 to 4.0.3

Matija madmatt04 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 9 10:16:46 EDT 2008


Hi,

just to clarify this, does that mean there are differences between the
free version release and the paid version release? Until now I wasn't
even aware the latter existed. If so, is it possible to learn what
those differences are? Also, are the benefits of support subscription
listed anywhere (specifically for JBoss Rules)? I tried to find it on
the web site but all I could find was the generic JBoss subscription
page, which isn't very informative.

Thanks,

M.

On 09/04/2008, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:
>
>  Chris Woodrow wrote:
> Hi,
>  I would to share our experience about recent versions of Drools.
>  We found out that 4.0.6 was out on last wednesday, so we decided to move up
> from 4.0.3 to 4.0.6. We made a few tests but we counted on the fact that
> backward compatibility was provided. On friday, I went on Drools website and
> found out that version 4.0.6 was replaced by 4.0.4 whithout any more
> explaination, I made a research on this list to find out that you had to
> make a roll back. At the same time we found out a drools bug on our app :
>
>  Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
>          at
> org.drools.base.evaluators.ObjectFactory$ObjectEqualsComparator.equals(ObjectFactory.java:561)
>          at
> org.drools.base.evaluators.ObjectFactory$ObjectNotEqualEvaluator.evaluate(ObjectFactory.java:158)
>          at
> org.drools.rule.LiteralRestriction.isAllowed(LiteralRestriction.java:61)
>          at
> org.drools.rule.LiteralConstraint.isAllowed(LiteralConstraint.java:82)
>          at
> org.drools.reteoo.AccumulateNode.assertTuple(AccumulateNode.java:156)
>          at
> org.drools.reteoo.CompositeTupleSinkAdapter.propagateAssertTuple(CompositeTupleSinkAdapter.java:30)
>          at
> org.drools.reteoo.FromNode.assertTuple(FromNode.java:90)
>          at
> org.drools.reteoo.SingleTupleSinkAdapter.propagateAssertTuple(SingleTupleSinkAdapter.java:20)
>          at
> org.drools.reteoo.JoinNode.assertTuple(JoinNode.java:107)
>          at
> org.drools.reteoo.SingleTupleSinkAdapter.propagateAssertTuple(SingleTupleSinkAdapter.java:20)
>          at
> org.drools.reteoo.JoinNode.assertObject(JoinNode.java:151)
>          at
> org.drools.reteoo.SingleObjectSinkAdapter.propagateAssertObject(SingleObjectSinkAdapter.java:22)
>          at
> org.drools.reteoo.AlphaNode.assertObject(AlphaNode.java:140)
>          at
> org.drools.reteoo.CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.propagateAssertObject(CompositeObjectSinkAdapter.java:318)
>          at
> org.drools.reteoo.ObjectTypeNode.assertObject(ObjectTypeNode.java:153)
>          at
> org.drools.reteoo.Rete.assertObject(Rete.java:175)
>          at
> org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase.assertObject(ReteooRuleBase.java:192)
>          at
> org.drools.reteoo.ReteooWorkingMemory.doInsert(ReteooWorkingMemory.java:71)
>          at
> org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:909)
>          at
> org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:881)
>          at
> org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:682)
>
>  We had to deploy our app on friday, so we decieded to rollback to 4.0.4 to
> find out that we had the same error. So we decided to rollback to 4.0.3, I
> went to the download section of your site, and found out that previous
> versions where just unavailable, which is unacceptable. Obviously, I found
> it on our SVN, but I wasn't very happy about this.
>  Its "unnaccptable"?  that we don't maintain free community resources at our
> descretion? If binaries are not available for download, you can always build
> your own:
>  http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/tags/
>
>  Or you could pay for priority support and full access to downloads. Btw the
> paid version also goes through extra levels of QA, by dedicated teams, so
> you avoid this.
>
>
>  Here are my conclusions :
>  - We are not going to change our version of Drools soon
>  - Please give us access to previous versions
>
>  Chris
>  ________________________________
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>  rules-users mailing list
>  rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>  https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>



More information about the rules-users mailing list