[rules-users] Software Licensing Question Related to Bundled Eclipse Jarfile, "core-3.2.3.v_686_R32x.jar"?

[Mark Proctor]

WILLIAMS Kerry wrote:
> Hello!
>  
> My apologies in advance if this isn't the correct list for this 
> question! I'm evaluating the possibility integrating Drools into an 
> project that I'm working on. I see from the packaging that Drools 
> itself uses the Apache License v2.0 which is fine for my purposes. The 
> question I have though is with Drools 4.0.4/4.0.5 Java-like rules 
> language plugin. To use the Java lang for the .drl file I'm required 
> to include an eclipse jar (core-3.2.3.v_686_R32x.jar) in my 
> distribution. Which license applies to that eclipse .jar? Is it the 
> Eclipse license or the Drools adoption of Apache 2.0?
The eclipse jar is covered by the eclipse public license.
>  
> Thanks for your time!
> -Kerry
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20080418/800a223b/attachment.html