[rules-users] Are rule-contents testable ?

[Michal Bali]

Hi,

What license does this 'Spreadsheet based scenario test tool' have? Is it
ASL ver. 2? or GPL?

Best Regards,
Michal


On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 2:31 PM, Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org> wrote:

>  Adhikari, Ram wrote:
>
>  Hi All,
>
>
>
>             I've been playing with BRMS (4.x) for some time & found it very
> interesting & useful. Wondering if the BRMS system has (or if there's plan
> in 5.x) testing infrastructure for rules. Before I actually create a
> snapshot (and make the rules available to the clients), it would be nice to
> have a "playground" where I can simulate some of the scenarios & validate if
> the rule-contents are getting executed the way i want them to be.  Given
> that the rule definitions are actually parsed by the system (drl file
> grammar), it should be possible to automatically generate test cases that
> can walk through different blocks in the rule definition. Also, generation
> of test data should not be tough.
>
> Drools 5.0 has some capabilities for this. There is also a excel
> spreadsheet testing app that Qantas donated, but this won't make 5.0 as it
> needs someone to take the time to clean it up - any takers?
> https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBRULES-1685
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -ram
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing listrules-users at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20080825/36abdc5f/attachment.html