[rules-users] missing parameters in the fact object
Edson Tirelli
tirelli at post.com
Wed Feb 6 07:33:11 EST 2008
Agenda groups control only the firing of the rules, not the evaluation.
All the evaluation is eagerly executed as usual in Rete algorithm.
[]s
Edson
2008/2/5, Jai Vasanth <jaivasanth at gmail.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am using agenda groups to pick sets of rules to fire based on an
> attribute value. The presence or absence of other attributes is dependent
> on the value of this attribute based on which I select a particular agenda
> group.
>
> Here is an example
>
> rule "ABC"
> when
> Shape( type = "rectangle" )
> then
> drools.setFocus("twodimensional")
> end
>
>
> rule "PQR"
> when
> Shape( type = "cube" )
> then
> drools.setFocus("threedimensional")
> end
>
> rule "area threshold"
> agenda-group "twodimensional"
> when
> Shape( area > 20 )
> then
> System.out.println ("large object" );
> end
>
> rule "volume threshold"
> agenda-group "threedimensional"
> when
> Shape( volume > 20 )
> then
> System.out.println ("large object" );
> end
>
>
> Suppose if my shape object is a rectangle, then it wouldnt have the volume
> attribute. In this case when we try to run these rules it would throw a
> NoSuchElementException.
>
> Is there a way to avoid this? Agenda groups help us fire the RHSs
> conditionally, Is there a way by which I can conditionally fire LHS of
> certain sets of rules ?
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Jai
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20080206/9eb85a8d/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list