[rules-users] Do you have a Bug?
Héron Nicolas
nheron at sopragroup.com
Thu Mar 13 12:20:22 EDT 2008
Hello,
I Had the same probleme with maven 2.0.8 (I used this before) and in the documentation, it is written that
maven 2.0.6 is needed, so I went back to 2.0.6 but no change
Nicolas (my first name)
-------- Message d'origine--------
De: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org de la part de Edson Tirelli
Date: jeu. 13/03/2008 14:34
À: Rules Users List
Objet : Re: RE : [rules-users] Do you have a Bug?
Héron,
We are looking into the plugin build error. Meanwhile, please update to
maven 2.0.8. Unfortunately maven is having some problems to build with
different versions.
[]s
Edson
2008/3/13, Héron Nicolas <nheron at sopragroup.com>:
>
> Hello,
> I am trying to compile the 4.0.x and
> 1) there are always test unit not working => I have to skip the test in
> maven
> 2)
> get the following error
>
> [java] /home/nheron/workspace-source-drools-4.0.x/jbossrules/drools-
> eclipse3.2/target/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.pde.build_3.2.1.r321_v20060823/scripts/genericTargets.xml:80:
> Unable to find plug-in: org.drools.eclipse_0.0.0. Please check the error
> log for more details.
>
> [java] Total time: 2 seconds
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ERROR] BUILD ERROR
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Error executing ant tasks
>
> Embedded error: Java returned: 13
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Trace
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Error executing
> ant tasks
> at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(
> DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:564)
> at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLifecycle
> (DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:480)
> at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal
> (DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:459)
> at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandleFailures
> (DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:311)
> at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegments(
> DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:278)
> at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(
> DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:143)
> at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:334)
> at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:125)
> at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:272)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
> at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(
> DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
> at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
> at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java
> :315)
> at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
> at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(
> Launcher.java:430)
> at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
> Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Error executing
> ant tasks
> at org.apache.maven.plugin.antrun.AbstractAntMojo.executeTasks(
> AbstractAntMojo.java:114)
> at org.apache.maven.plugin.antrun.AntRunMojo.execute(
> AntRunMojo.java:83)
> at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo(
> DefaultPluginManager.java:443)
> at
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(
> DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:539)
> ... 16 more
> Caused by: Java returned: 13
> at org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.Java.execute(Java.java:87)
> at org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java
> :275)
> at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:364)
> at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.execute(Target.java:341)
> at org.apache.maven.plugin.antrun.AbstractAntMojo.executeTasks(
> AbstractAntMojo.java:108)
> ... 19 more
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 1 minute 29 seconds
> [INFO] Finished at: Thu Mar 13 13:47:49 CET 2008
> [INFO] Final Memory: 23M/44M
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> What did i do wrong ?
> I use maven 2.0.6, ant 1.7.0 , jdk 1.5 b13
>
>
> I had problems with dynamic rules in drools 4.0.4 which I don't have any
> more in a drools 5 snapshot through the hudson stuf.
>
> Thanks
> regards
> Nicolas Héron
>
> -------- Message d'origine--------
> De: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org de la part de Mark Proctor
> Date: jeu. 13/03/2008 03:17
> À: Rules Users List; Rules Dev List
> Objet : [rules-users] Do you have a Bug?
>
> We've fixed a huge number of things for 4.0.5. We are going to try and
> get the release out this friday. So please hurry if you have a bug then
> let us know, especially if you have a fix :) And don't forget to try
> your bug out on 4.0.x in svn in case its already fixed:
>
> http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/branches/4.0.x/
>
> Mark
>
> Mark Proctor wrote:
> > Narendra Valada wrote:
> >> I had reported an issue a couple of weeks ago with nested inner
> >> classes not being handled correctly.
> >>
> >> I made some changes to the org.drools.base.ClassTypeResolver class to
> >> resolve it and everything appears to work fine.
> >>
> >> How do I provide the fix and test case to you? Do you want me to
> >> raise a JIRA?
> > Yes you will need to raise a JIRA. At this stage we have no plans to
> > fix this, as we can consider inner inner classes esoteric enough to
> > say it's unsupported. Although if someone can provide a clean patch,
> > it would be nice to fix. You'll have to be quick though, if you want
> > the fix in 4.0.5
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Narendra
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/8/08, *Mark Proctor* <mproctor at codehaus.org
> >> <mailto:mproctor at codehaus.org <mproctor at codehaus.org>>> wrote:
> >>
> >> We are about to release 4.0.5, next week. This has a large number
> >> of bug
> >> fixes, especially multi-threading bugs. Anyone that has production
> >> issues can you please do a checkout for the 4.0.x branch asap and
> >> provide us with a test case if it is not fixed. If you don't get
> your
> >> test case to us by end of monday, start of tuesday, you'll have
> >> to wait
> >> another 2 months+ for 4.0.6.
> >> http://anonsvn.labs.jboss.com/labs/jbossrules/branches/4.0.x/
> >>
> >> Mark
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rules-users mailing list
> >> rules-users at lists.jboss.org <mailto:rules-users at lists.jboss.org<rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> >
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> rules-users mailing list
> >> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >>
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
--
Edson Tirelli
JBoss Drools Core Development
Office: +55 11 3529-6000
Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20080313/560741e2/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list