[rules-users] Re: [rules-dev] Re : Drools 4.0.x branch has still some issues with serialization

[Mark Proctor]

siddhartha banik wrote:
>  
> Hi Drools Team,
>  
> I have checked out *Drools 4.0.x branch* & found that all my test 
> scenarios with *"Dynamic Rules"* are now *working fine* *:-)*.
>  
> Thanks a lot for fixing the issues so promptly. I appreciate it !!!
>  
> Now, we will definitely use Drools in our application.
Great don't forget your JBoss Drools support subcription.
>  
> I have a *Good To have* feature request for Drools:   "Include check 
> for duplicate objects being asserted into Working Memory & don't 
> generate any activation for such objects or silently don't assert them 
> at all in WM."  I tested this scenario with *JESS*, they are already 
> doing that. This will save Drools user from doing duplicate check, 
> which is bit costly now.
> Or can you please suggest me any simple way, by which still I 
> can achieve this in Drools ?
You can do this already. Change the engine from identity mode to 
equality mode.
>  
> Thanks & Happy Drooling
> Siddhartha
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-dev mailing list
> rules-dev at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-dev
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20080314/ad2771d4/attachment.html