[rules-users] Use of "update" with activation-group set.

[Greg Barton]

Ok, I should have read the docs. :P

Methinks lock-on-active will do it.

--- On Mon, 11/3/08, Greg Barton <greg_barton at yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: Greg Barton <greg_barton at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Use of "update" with activation-group set.
> To: "Rules Users List" <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> Date: Monday, November 3, 2008, 9:20 AM
> My first guess would be to set no-loop to true for all rules
> in the activation-group, but that probably wouldn't
> work. (Worth a try if you haven't done so already.) The
> question is whether no-loop can be scoped for an entire
> activation-group, or if it only applies to the individual
> rule.  I'm guessing the latter.  
> 
> --- On Mon, 11/3/08, Nimesh Muley
> <nimeshm at mastek.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Nimesh Muley <nimeshm at mastek.com>
> > Subject: [rules-users] Use of "update" with
> activation-group set.
> > To: "'Rules Users List'"
> <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
> > Date: Monday, November 3, 2008, 2:22 AM
> > Hi,
> > 
> > In a DRL I have activation-group for certain rules
> along
> > with ruleflow-group. I also need to "update"
> the
> > object as I need the updated value in some other
> > ruleflow-group. Since the updated object is part of
> the
> > condition, the other rules in the same activation
> group get
> > fired once a rule in that activation group has been
> fired.
> > 
> > Is there a way out for this? If more information is
> needed
> > to understand this then I can send it across.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > Regards,
> > - Nimesh
> > 
> > MASTEK LTD.
> > Mastek is in NASSCOM's 'India Top 20'
> Software
> > Service Exporters List.
> > In the US, we're called MAJESCOMASTEK
> > 
> >
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the
> > individual and not that of Mastek Limited, unless
> > specifically indicated to that effect. Mastek Limited
> does
> > not accept any responsibility or liability for it.
> This
> > e-mail and attachments (if any) transmitted with it
> are
> > confidential and/or privileged and solely for the use
> of the
> > intended person or entity to which it is addressed.
> Any
> > review, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of
> or
> > taking of any action in reliance upon this information
> by
> > persons or entities other than the intended recipient
> is
> > prohibited. This e-mail and its attachments have been
> > scanned for the presence of computer viruses. It is
> the
> > responsibility of the recipient to run the virus check
> on
> > e-mails and attachments before opening them. If you
> have
> > received this e-mail in error, kindly delete this
> e-mail
> > from desktop and server.
> >
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > _______________________________________________
> > rules-users mailing list
> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users