[rules-users] Drools, Grails, and default packages for domain objects

[Edson Tirelli]

   Robert,

   What version of Drools are you using?
   I remember seeing something about this in the past... I will search JIRAs
to see if we have any ticket open for 5.0.

   []s
   Edson

2009/1/19 Costello, Robert <rcost10 at searshc.com>

>  Has anyone else run into issues trying to reference objects in a default
> package?  I'm trying to use Drools with Grails and my rule which compiled
> nicely in a package setting has issues when faced with a default package.
>
>
>
> The error is "foo" cannot be resolved to a type
>
>
>
> I've tried putting the rule both in the default package and putting it in a
> named package, and neither seem to work.   If I put my objects back into
> packages, everything is fine.
>
>
>
> Any  advice?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Robert Costello
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>


-- 
 Edson Tirelli
 JBoss Drools Core Development
 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090119/f088b795/attachment.html