[rules-users] Patterns in Memory

[Barry K]

The implementation uses a stateless rules engine and the memory snapshots are
taken when the engines are idle.   The Patterns object, I expect is just the
various condition and action nodes of each rule in the rulebase.

Thanks for your reply
Barry



Greg Barton wrote:
> 
> They have the same rules, but do they have the same data?
> 
> When you refer to "number of patterns" do you mean the number of matches
> between rules and working memory objects?  The increase of that number is
> entirely dependent on the structure of your rules.  Do they modify objects
> in working memory or add new objects?
> 
> --- On Tue, 3/3/09, Barry K <barry.knapp at railinc.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Barry K <barry.knapp at railinc.com>
>> Subject: [rules-users] Patterns in Memory
>> To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 10:47 AM
>> Do the number of patterns in memory stabilize after the
>> rulebase is created
>> or can transactions increase the number of patterns?
>> 
>> Reason I ask is I have 2 servers with the same rules loaded
>> and one shows
>> 3000 patterns in memory but the other only shows 2300.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Barry
>> -- 
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Patterns-in-Memory-tp22312660p22312660.html
>> Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at
>> Nabble.com.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Patterns-in-Memory-tp22312660p22313261.html
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.