[rules-users] Java beans inheritance

Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun at gmail.com
Thu Nov 12 11:48:16 EST 2009


Are you using MVEL at all in this rule?

Anyway, better would be

   class == SomeClass.class

which avoids string handling.

-W


On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 3:25 PM, Zohar Etzioni <zohar.etzioni at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a class hierarchy of objects that I'm inserting as facts. Lets
> say X, Y extends X and Z extends Y. I have a rule that is defined on X
> and therefore applies to all of them, however in the rule I want to
> ask about the class name and I'm referring to it as
> class.name=="some.class". This should work as far as I understand coz
> it keeps the java beans format, however it is not directly defined in
> the class X but rather in Object. The error I'm getting is "Error:
> could not access: name". Any idea what I'm doing wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> Dawg
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20091112/e4f90bb0/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list