[rules-users] compiled package too big

Wolfgang Laun wolfgang.laun at gmail.com
Fri Sep 25 07:01:27 EDT 2009


One proposal: Don't put the values to which you compare the attributes into
rules; put them into additional facts. Consider:

rule "bounds_a_1_10"
when
   Fact( a >= 1 && <= 10 )
then ... end

and  similar for 11:100, 101:1000,... could be handled by a single rule and
a set of Limit-type facts:

rule "bounds_a"
when
  Limit( ?low : low, ?high : high, ?x : x )
  Fact( a >= ?low && <= ?high )
then
   // enact consequence, parameterized with ?x
end

HTH
-W


2009/9/25 Ševčík Martin <MaSevcik at cpoj.cz>

>  Hello,
>
>
>
> I'm using drools 4.0.7. I have excel with about 4000 rows. After compiling
> it, the final Package is about 30 MB. And that's only one sheet, I have 3 of
> them. Total size is about 60MB. It's too big to hold it in memory, but too
> slow to read it from a file or database every time. Is there any chance to
> make the package smaller.  It's always the same rule, just different values
> of attributes (that's why we use excel) and I think, after compilation there
> are many information redundant in the package (they are repeating over and
> over for every row / rule.
>
>
>
> Do you have any solution how to solve this. It's a tariffication algorithm,
> and the response must be quick. Executing is not a problem, just how to
> store this big package.
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> Martin
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20090925/c3c88304/attachment.html 


More information about the rules-users mailing list