[rules-users] Better ways to write left hand sides
Dave Schweisguth
dave at schweisguth.org
Tue Sep 29 15:54:50 EDT 2009
Wolfgang,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 08:34:54AM +0200, Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:43 AM, Dave Schweisguth <dave at schweisguth.org>wrote:
> > 1) One of my facts' properties is a set of strings. The goal is to "grep"
> > them for some search string. The most convenient syntax I've come up with
> > so far is to give the fact a method anyTextContains which loops over the
> > set and calls contains(searchString) on each member, and then use
> >
> > fact: Fact() eval(fact.anyTextContains("searchString"))
> >
> > in my LHS. It's compact enough, but I wondered whether it could be done
> > without a custom method or eval. "from" seems not to be a possibility since
> > the collection is of strings, not objects. Any suggestions?
>
> But any java.lang.String is an Object, although without a field (in the
> usual sense), Nevertheless, try
>
> rule "Match John"
> when
> Vote( $names : names ) // Set<String> names
> String( this matches "John" ) from $names
> then
> System.out.println( "Hi John" );
> end
Thanks! That solves my (first) problem exactly. It does require my rule,
which modifies the fact it matches, to be lock-on-active, but that seems
fine in my case.
Thanks,
--
| Dave Schweisguth http://schweisguth.org/~dave/ |
| Home: dave at schweisguth.org Work: http://www.nileguide.com/ |
| For compliance with the NJ Right to Know Act: Contents partially unknown |
More information about the rules-users
mailing list