[rules-users] rulebase configuration Options

Kumar, Ravendra ravendra.kumar at logica.com
Fri Dec 17 05:53:35 EST 2010 

Hi Guys,


I am trying to find out  more information about rulebase configuration
options written in  "drools.default.rulebase.conf"

Do any of you guys know any blog or material written on these options,
If someone has written any blog on these options, and could I know the
location,  it will a great help.

Thanks,
Rav.

-----Original Message-----
From: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of
rules-users-request at lists.jboss.org
Sent: 17 December 2010 08:57
To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
Subject: rules-users Digest, Vol 49, Issue 44

Send rules-users mailing list submissions to
	rules-users at lists.jboss.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	rules-users-request at lists.jboss.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
	rules-users-owner at lists.jboss.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of rules-users digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: "Negative" Rules (Ansgar Konermann)
   2. Re: Using GlobalArea in Guvnor (Jervis Liu)
   3. Re: Guvnor with JBoss AS on Ubuntu (alim)
   4. Re: Deploying Guvnor 5.1 on Glassfish v3 (alim)
   5. DroolsFlow 5.1.1 ForEach + XOR/OR Gateway =	Impossible?
      (Dirk Hermanns)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:34:11 +0100
From: Ansgar Konermann <ansgar.konermann at googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] "Negative" Rules
To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
Message-ID: <4D0AA1F3.20307 at googlemail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

On 15.12.2010 10:01, Diego San Esteban wrote:
> Greetings,
>   
> How is  itpossible to implement a  "rollback"in  theKB?
>
> Suppose  that when retracting  a  fact,I  want toundo the  changes
made.
>    

A very simple, yet effective solution would be to exclusively use 
insertLogical(). No updates to facts which are already asserted, no 
normal "insert".

Best regards

Ansgar
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101217/aba8fe
65/attachment-0001.html 

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:29:16 +0800
From: Jervis Liu <jliu at redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Using GlobalArea in Guvnor
To: Rules Users List <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID: <4D0ACAFC.4090603 at redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 2010/12/17 0:41, Dean Whisnant wrote:
> Jervis,
>
> I see that it looks like you worked on and resolved this in
drools-5.2.M1 this morning.
>
> This is a noob question, but when or how can I get my hands on this
fix?  It's funny because I ran into this same issue today while trying
to do something similar to John.
>
You can grab the latest snapshot from this place: 
https://hudson.jboss.org/hudson/job/drools/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/
trunk/target/

Or you can wait for Drools 5.2.M1. It should come out next week if 
things go well.

Cheers,
Jervis

> Thanks
>
> Dean
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org
[mailto:rules-users-bounces at lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Jervis Liu
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 8:30 AM
> To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> Subject: Re: [rules-users] Using GlobalArea in Guvnor
>
> This is a bug. I've filed jira
> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1124. I will take a look into
this jira next week.
>
> Thanks,
> Jervis
>
> On 2010/12/15 2:24, John Peterson wrote:
>>> I'm working with Guvnor 5.1.1 and I'm having an issue accessing
>>>> Declarative Models defined in the Global Area in the Packages.  Is
>>>> it possible to create a shared model in the Global Area and then
>>>> write rules against them in other packages?  It would seem to me
>>>> that the answer would be yes (why else have a "Global" area), but,
>>>> for some reason, it doesn't seem to recognize them.
>>>>
>>>> Here's a scenario:
>>>>
>>>> I declare a DeclarativeModel in GlobalArea:
>>>>
>>>> GenericFact
>>>>     id: Integer
>>>>     valueOne: Integer
>>>>     label: String
>>>> end
>>>>
>>>> I have a package called com.experiment.  I'd like to write Business
>> Rule
>>>> in it using that GenericFact.  However, when I click the "+" sign
to
>> add
>>>> a Fact, I see a yellow background over "Note: No model has been
>>>> defined."  Is there something that needs to be done to make the
>>>> GlobalArea stuff viewable from the individual packages?
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:10:25 -0800 (PST)
From: alim <audrey.lim at it-vision.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor with JBoss AS on Ubuntu
To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
Message-ID: <1292573425491-2103469.post at n3.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Hey Chris

When doing the telnet from the client box i get: 
"telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused"

However, there's also another AS on that same server listening on port
8080
and there it's no problem to connect to that one. 

Plus I also tried running JBoss on port 8080 (while having the other AS
shut
down), and also there the same problem:
Telnet local: "Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost."
Telnet remote: "telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection
refused"

Considering that, it couldn't be a firewall problem, could it?

Thanks for the help!
Audrey



Chris Selwyn wrote:
> 
> Maybe a firewall(iptables) issue?
> Can you do the telnet from your client box?
> 
> Chris
> 

-- 
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-with-JBoss-AS
-on-Ubuntu-tp2098972p2103469.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:40:34 -0800 (PST)
From: alim <audrey.lim at it-vision.com>
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Deploying Guvnor 5.1 on Glassfish v3
To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
Message-ID: <1292575234053-2103565.post at n3.nabble.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


I'm using Glassfish Version 3.0.1.



Andrew Waterman wrote:
> 
> Yes, I have Guvnor 5.1 working on Glassfish 2.1.1 as well.  Glassfish3
is
> built on OSGI, which seems to have fundamentally changed the
container.  
> 
> Which version of Glassfish are you seeing issues?
> 
> best wishes,
> 
> Andrew
> 

-- 
View this message in context:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Deploying-Guvnor-5-1
-on-Glassfish-v3-tp2091982p2103565.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:57:10 +0100
From: Dirk Hermanns <d.hermanns at lvm.de>
Subject: [rules-users] DroolsFlow 5.1.1 ForEach + XOR/OR Gateway =
	Impossible?
To: rules-users at lists.jboss.org
Message-ID:
	
<OFA0CCC39F.CF72C883-ONC12577FC.0030E9B9-C12577FC.00312E27 at lvm.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"



Hi everybody!

I'm struggling with the forEach construct. We already had a Drools Flow
running using Drools 5.0.
Now we would like to port it to Drools Flow 5.1.1.

It seems that there is a problem with the ForEach Construct in
combination
with the XOR Gateway (the same
seems to be true for the OR Gateway):

Even if i set both constrains of the gateway to "eval( true )" i got an
runtime Error like (full Stacktrace at the end of my post):
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: XOR split could not find
at
least one valid outgoing connection for split Art des Arbeitsanstosses
pruefen

I can even reproduce this behaviour when building a small workflow from
scratch.
Had anyone else such an error? Does anyone know a workaround for this?
You can reproduce this with the attached Flows.

Any help is really appreciated!
Regards,
Dirk Hermanns

P.S.: If i try to build such an Flow using the new bpmn Notation, i get
an
error when building the package in Guvnor: Workitem Node xxx has no
incoming connection.
So this doesn't seem to help :(. Has anyone got the forEach (or Multiple
Instances) feature with Drools 5.1.1 working?


org.drools.RuntimeDroolsException: Unexpected exception executing action
org.drools.process.instance.event.DefaultSignalManager$SignalAction at 15c9
0f4

? ? ? at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.executeQueuedActions
(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1473)
? ? ? at org.drools.common.DefaultAgenda.fireAllRules
(DefaultAgenda.java:1074)
? ? ? at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.fireAllRules
(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:785)
? ? ? at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.fireAllRules
(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:751)
? ? ? at
org.drools.process.instance.impl.DefaultWorkItemManager.completeWorkItem
(DefaultWorkItemManager.java:120)
? ? ? at
de.lvm.vorverteilung.internal.util.VorvertelungsauftragAnalysierenWorkIt
emHandler.executeWorkItem

(VorvertelungsauftragAnalysierenWorkItemHandler.java:51)
? ? ? at
org.drools.process.instance.impl.DefaultWorkItemManager.internalExecuteW
orkItem

(DefaultWorkItemManager.java:72)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.WorkItemNodeInstance.internalTrigger
(WorkItemNodeInstance.java:101)
? ? ? at org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.trigger
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:117)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.triggerConnection
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:178)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.triggerCompleted
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:144)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.StartNodeInstance.triggerCompleted
(StartNodeInstance.java:49)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.StartNodeInstance.internalTrigger
(StartNodeInstance.java:41)
? ? ? at org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.trigger
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:117)
? ? ? at
org.drools.ruleflow.instance.RuleFlowProcessInstance.internalStart

(RuleFlowProcessInstance.java:32)
? ? ? at org.drools.process.instance.impl.ProcessInstanceImpl.start
(ProcessInstanceImpl.java:192)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.WorkflowProcessInstanceImpl.start
(WorkflowProcessInstanceImpl.java:309)
? ? ? at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.startProcess
(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1644)
? ? ? at org.drools.impl.StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.startProcess
(StatefulKnowledgeSessionImpl.java:306)
? ? ? at
de.lvm.vorverteilung.internal.rules.TerminHRuleFlowTest.runTermin1

(TerminHRuleFlowTest.java:252)
? ? ? at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
? ? ? at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
? ? ? at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke
(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
? ? ? at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
? ? ? at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall
(FrameworkMethod.java:44)
? ? ? at org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run
(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
? ? ? at org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively
(FrameworkMethod.java:41)
? ? ? at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate
(InvokeMethod.java:20)
? ? ? at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate
(RunBefores.java:28)
? ? ? at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate
(RunAfters.java:31)
? ? ? at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild
(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:70)
? ? ? at org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild
(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:44)
? ? ? at
org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:180)
? ? ? at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:41)
? ? ? at
org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:173)
? ? ? at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunBefores.evaluate
(RunBefores.java:28)
? ? ? at org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate
(RunAfters.java:31)
? ? ? at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:220)
? ? ? at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run
(JUnit4TestReference.java:46)
? ? ? at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run
(TestExecution.java:38)
? ? ? at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests
(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)
? ? ? at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests
(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)
? ? ? at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run
(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)
? ? ? at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main
(RemoteTestRunner.java:197)
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: XOR split could not find
at
least one valid outgoing connection for split Art des Arbeitsanstosses
pruefen
? ? ? at org.drools.workflow.instance.node.SplitInstance.internalTrigger
(SplitInstance.java:92)
? ? ? at org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.trigger
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:117)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.triggerConnection
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:178)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.triggerCompleted
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:144)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.ExtendedNodeInstanceImpl.triggerComple
ted

(ExtendedNodeInstanceImpl.java:53)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.StateBasedNodeInstance.triggerComplete
d
(StateBasedNodeInstance.java:117)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.StateBasedNodeInstance.triggerComplete
d
(StateBasedNodeInstance.java:98)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.WorkItemNodeInstance.internalTrigger
(WorkItemNodeInstance.java:105)
? ? ? at org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.trigger
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:117)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.triggerConnection
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:178)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.NodeInstanceImpl.triggerCompleted
(NodeInstanceImpl.java:144)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.ExtendedNodeInstanceImpl.triggerComple
ted

(ExtendedNodeInstanceImpl.java:53)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.StateBasedNodeInstance.triggerComplete
d
(StateBasedNodeInstance.java:117)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.StateBasedNodeInstance.triggerComplete
d
(StateBasedNodeInstance.java:98)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.node.RuleSetNodeInstance.signalEvent
(RuleSetNodeInstance.java:71)
? ? ? at
org.drools.workflow.instance.impl.WorkflowProcessInstanceImpl.signalEven
t
(WorkflowProcessInstanceImpl.java:343)
? ? ? at
org.drools.process.instance.event.DefaultSignalManager.internalSignalEve
nt
(DefaultSignalManager.java:79)
? ? ? at org.drools.process.instance.event.DefaultSignalManager
$SignalAction.execute(DefaultSignalManager.java:167)
? ? ? at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.executeQueuedActions
(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:1471)
? ? ? ... 43 more

(See attached file: ZZTestFlow2.rf)(See attached file: ZZTestFlow.bpmn)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101217/ba34b3
28/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ZZTestFlow2.rf
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3232 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101217/ba34b3
28/attachment.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ZZTestFlow.bpmn
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 5871 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101217/ba34b3
28/attachment-0001.obj 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: LVM_Unternehmenssignatur.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 29468 bytes
Desc: not available
Url :
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101217/ba34b3
28/attachment.pdf 

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users at lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


End of rules-users Digest, Vol 49, Issue 44
*******************************************


Think green - keep it on the screen.

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you.

More information about the rules-users mailing list