[rules-users] QA features in BRMS

[Benson Fung]

Yes, I tried QA analysis.  But it only can find out the problems of the
individual rules like what you said.  I tried to develop two rules with
sames conditions but different consequences and do the QA analysis, it
cannot detect it unfortunately.  :(




2010/12/30 Esteban Aliverti <esteban.aliverti at gmail.com>

> I think QA analysis should find some of those problems. Did you try it? As
> far as I know, it looks for range completeness, missing gaps, etc.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> Esteban Aliverti
> - Developer @ http://www.plugtree.com
> - Blog @ http://ilesteban.wordpress.com
>
>
> 2010/12/30 Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com>
>
> The general case would be extremely difficult to solve. It would require
>> heavy expression manipulation. Consider a very simple variation:
>>    X($f: foo)
>>    Y(bar == $f)
>> as compared to
>>    Y($b: bar)
>>    X(foo == $b)
>>
>> And you can play this game at any level of complexity.
>>
>> And even your "straightforward" case would require the consideration of
>> rule attributes, since there would not be a conflict if they are in
>> different agenda groups, etc.
>>
>>
>> -W
>>
>>
>>
>> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <benson.redhat at gmail.com>:
>> > The conflict is like :
>> >
>> > E.g.
>> > If (X = 90) then Score = 10;
>> > If (X = 90) then Score = 100;
>> >
>> > Can the BRMS detect this?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun at gmail.com
>> >
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Please define "conflict".
>> >> -W
>> >>
>> >> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <benson.fung at redhat.com>:
>> >> > I would like to check if there is any conflict among the created
>> rules
>> >> > in
>> >> > the BRMS 5.1.  Can the QA/Verify can check this out?
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Wolfgang Laun <
>> wolfgang.laun at gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please don't assume that everybody knows which "features" and
>> >> >> which "conflicts" and which "checks" you have in mind.
>> >> >> -W
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 2010/12/30 Benson Fung <benson.redhat at gmail.com>:
>> >> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Can anyone know whether QA features can provide the rule conflict
>> >> >> > checks?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Thanks
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> > rules-users mailing list
>> >> >> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> >> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> rules-users mailing list
>> >> >> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> >> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Benson Fung
>> >> > Solution Architect, Global Services, Greater China
>> >> > | Redhat Hong Kong Limited || 45/F., The Lee Gardens, 33 Hysan
>> Avenue,
>> >> > Causeway Bay, Hong Kong || Office : 852-31802332 || Cell :
>> 852-98369898
>> >> > ||
>> >> > benson.fung at redhat.com || http://www.hk.redhat.com||
>> >> >
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > rules-users mailing list
>> >> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> >> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> rules-users mailing list
>> >> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > rules-users mailing list
>> > rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101230/6af1ce41/attachment.html