[rules-users] Process with subprocesses don't continue after finish work items in the subprocesses

[Computer Wetenschappen]

Dirk,

There is a junit test testPersistenceSubProcess() that is testing exactly 
that use case:
http://anonsvn.jboss.org/repos/labs/labs/jbossrules/trunk/drools-persistence-jpa/src/test/java/org/drools/persistence/session/PersistentStatefulSessionTest.java

Could you create a simple test cases that reproduces this incorrect 
behaviour?

Kris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dirk" <drools at dirkp.de>
To: <rules-users at lists.jboss.org>
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 3:05 PM
Subject: [rules-users] Process with subprocesses don't continue after finish 
work items in the subprocesses


>
> Hey Drools-Users,
>
> I've got a big and urgent problem with my drools process. I have a complex
> process with many decisions and subprocesses. These subprocesses could 
> even
> contains more subprocesses so that i have a four-level flow.
>
> I testet each subprocess isolated in a mock environment and now i get my
> problem when they are combined in a big "super-process". I create the
> process with the JPAKnowledgeService (and VariablePersistenceStrategy) and
> everything works as expected. The process execute some actions, a
> validation-subprocess and another subprocess with a human task (with a
> custom handler). The process stops and persist all the variables (except
> Integers; Must be a bug?). Perfect. Now I load the session with the
> JPAKnowledgeService and complete the workitem with the
> ksession.getWorkItemManager().completeWorkItem method. The subprocess now
> execute to the end and then the engine stopps without an error. But there
> are more steps in the superprocess todo. All subprocesse are "independent 
> =
> true" with "wait for completion = true" and don't have timers.
>
> Has anybody an idea? Is this a known problem? I'm using the last
> successfully build form the 21.02.2010. Do you need the process? (Then i
> have to remove some internal information and could post it...)
>
> Many thanks in advance
> Dirk
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://n3.nabble.com/Process-with-subprocesses-don-t-continue-after-finish-work-items-in-the-subprocesses-tp326801p326801.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users 


Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm