[rules-users] AGE problem

[Wolfgang Laun]

On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:07 AM, djb <dbrownell83 at hotmail.com> wrote:

>
> I think though that the majority of uses for a rules engine is in a
> business
> context, where they don't use astronomical time.
>
> If the doctor's orders are:
> "You cannot get out of bed for 2 months"
>
> This means 59 days if he told you February 1st, and it means 62 days if he
> told you July 1st.
>
>
This is a particularly bad example, because doctors can't say that - at
least not one I'd trust ;-)

I'm arguing that you cannot expect a computer program to relieve you from
the burden of defining what you mean by a "duration of one year" (or month).
Some legal rules require a person to have a certain age, and it is (for
humans)
more convenient to decide this on a person's birthday YMD plus an increment
in the Y number. If  your application requires you to use an increment in
the year
component of the YMDhms representation of a point in time, then you are
indeed stuck with Calendar and the resulting overhead. (Memoizing
the results of YMDhms +/- n years might speed things up, for the usual
price.)

But many applications would be satisfied with using a fixed duration for
a year in terms of 365 or 365.25 or some such value. If, for instance, you
have a  library, and you must decide to move a book into deep storage
"if it has  not been requested for more than a year" you might calculate
this (faster) by adding 356*24*60*60 to the clock value of the last return.

-W

So at least for me, I am going to have to work out a plan that involves
> GregorianCalendar.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://n3.nabble.com/AGE-problem-tp215215p354847.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20100223/3459eff5/attachment.html