[rules-users] Stateless Vs Stateful Sessions in Webtier

[Simon Thum]

Wolfgang Laun wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Simon Thum <simon.thum at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Personally, I look at it like:
>>
>> stateless -> propositional logic
>> stateful -> first-order logic
>>
> 
> This is a false proposition ;-)
> 
> 'not', 'exists' and 'forall' - Drools' support for first-order logic
> quantifiers - is
> fully available (such as all the other features for LHS) in a stateless session.
Thanks for the clarification. So stateless _uses_ state but just doesn't
have it bound to the session?

If that's true, is there a deeper sense behind StatelessSession not
supporting agenda arbitration?

IOW, should I reasonably be able to cook up a
"SomewhatStatelessSessionWithAgendaSupport", or would I end up with a
half-arsed StatefulSession ?

> 
> -W
> 
>> I'm not sure that's 100% true though. In any case, it depends on the
>> kind of questions you like to ask. If you're not sure, test it.
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Simon
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>