[rules-users] Doubt regardging Drools-RETE

[Harshit Bapna]

Yes Mark. It is definitely beneficial.

I would really appreciate your answer on my questions.
I have read a lot about RETE performance boost but struggling to find answer
to my questions as my understanding on RETE is limited.
   1. If there are not many common facts i.e all rules are operating on
distinct facts / data. Does this mean the algorithm will not   bring in much
benefit ?
  2. Also if the facts are same but the LHS of a rule is quite different
from others then will RETE have its benefits.

I hope learned people on rete and drools can help me on this..
2010/11/11 Mark Proctor <mproctor at codehaus.org>

>   On 11/11/2010 05:28, Harshit Bapna wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> 1. If there are not many common facts i.e all rules are operating on
> distinct facts / data. Does this mean the algorithm will not bring in much
> benefit ?
> 2. Also if the facts are same but the LHS of a rule is quite different from
> others then will RETE have its benefits.
>
>
> I have gone through the RETE algorithm documentation and RETE node diagram
> chart but still finding difficulty to understand it.
> Can somebody please provide a layman language link to understand RETE.
>
> I would forget about the algorithm and focus on the language. Does the
> declarative language allow you to solve your problem in a better way?
>
> Mark
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing listrules-users at lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101111/6a1e963b/attachment.html