[rules-users] Issue 2782 - Potential memory leak when rules are often reloaded
Leonardo Gomes
leonardo.f.gomes at gmail.com
Mon Nov 15 08:27:52 EST 2010
Hi Pentarakis,
I had a quick look at your issue. I couldn't understand why you're re-adding
the same rules to your KB.
* Now, I redo this and add the same 100 rules again to the KnowledgeBase
> (2nd run). And so on.*
>
I think that a better approach is to cache your knowledge base and get a *new
*stateless or stateful session, whenever you need to run your rules. There's
no need to re add the same rules to an existing KB before a run.
Hope that helps.
Leonardo.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Pentarakis <pentarakis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I created a new issue some days ago. I'm new to the jboss community and
> therefore not sure whether I did it correctly. It seems like no one has
> found it yet.
>
> Could somebody have a look at it and could provide me feedback?
>
> http://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2782
> http://jira.jboss.org/browse/JBRULES-2782
>
> THANK YOU VERY MUCH IN ADVANCE !!!
>
>
> Kind regards
> Pentarakis
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Issue-2782-Potential-memory-leak-when-rules-are-often-reloaded-tp1904160p1904160.html
> Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101115/045f5da3/attachment.html
More information about the rules-users
mailing list