[rules-users] Can Drools Flow Persistence Work without JTA

[Anatoly]

if you use Spring, you can just use
"org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaTransactionManager" with non-XA
transactions:
http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/Exception-using-persistence-tp856774p863641.html

/Anatoly

On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Kris Verlaenen <
Kris.Verlaenen at cs.kuleuven.be> wrote:

> Yes, we made the transaction manager pluggable, with a default
> implementation for JTA and Spring.  You can take a look at the
> drools-persistence-jpa module, there is a
> org.drools.persistence.session.TransactionManager, that is the interface
> you would have to implement, with the
> org.drools.persistence.session.JtaTransactionManager as a sample
> implementation.
>
> Kris
>
> Quoting Rui Tang <tangrui.cn at gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi list,
> >
> > According to the documents and some test cases, I found that Drools
> > Flow
> > persistence examples have to work with JTA to enable transaction
> > management.
> >
> > Is there some way to not use JTA as my transaction manager?
> >
> > --
> > å” ç ¿
> >
>
>
>
>
> Disclaimer: http://www.kuleuven.be/cwis/email_disclaimer.htm
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users at lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/rules-users/attachments/20101115/7ac36960/attachment.html