[rules-users] forall not delivering as expected

[OlliSee]

Hi there,

I'm experiencing the same problem using Drools 5.1.1
Whats the status on this?

By the way. It also doesn't work the other way round with

   not (exists(X(y != z))) 

which is basically the same as

   forall($x : X()
          X(this == $x, y == z)
   )

If this is still a problem, how can I surpass this to get expected results?
Thanks in advance.

Oliver

-- 
View this message in context: http://drools-java-rules-engine.46999.n3.nabble.com/forall-not-delivering-as-expected-tp1461552p1972065.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.